Many People today use their phones for sending texts more than talking ?
what are the reason for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages ?
Usually people use phone to communicate with someone to speak and convey any kind of message but it is found that it being broadly used for communicating via texts over calls.
There are numerous factors behind it and though it may have advantages but I personally believe that it has more negative development and drawbacks.
In today's generation almost every person holds personal mobile device to connect with people and communicate with everyone. In today's hectic busy life, people don't know what would be the best time to talk and end user may be in a situation where he or she can not attend the call, so giving personal space is one of the primary reasons. In addition to this, another important reason I could think upon is people can respond as per their convenience. For example, in China, people always prefer to send messages for long hours than talking to someone.
However, ever since the induction of large numbers of social media applications such as facebook, twitter, whatsapp ,wechat and other, people used to remain active most of the time and stay online for long hours. Usage of phones has increased to such an extent for sending unnecessary texts. text can be used to troll someone badly in a wrong way.
It leads to some psychological disorder such as losing focus , reduce productivity at work. Also people could not able to spend quality time with family and losing one of the precious things in the world. In the era of internet , it is being widely misused as well for sending text for all the wrong reasons on social media. Adding to this, on a lighter note speaking would always save more time compared to keep on sending texts over phone and come to conclusion early rather than leading to confusion.
To recapitulate, although it may have advantage of giving personal space but there are more disadvantages of using phones for sending texts which will impact in a longer run personally and professionally and adversely affect the family and balanced life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nbsp;In todays hectic busy life, people dont know what would be the best time to tal...
^^^^
Line 11, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ions such as facebook, twitter, whatsapp ,wechat and other, people used to r...
^^
Line 11, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Text
...n extent for sending unnecessary texts. text can be used to troll someone badly in a...
^^^^
Line 11, column 339, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...text can be used to troll someone badly in a wrong way. It leads to some psychological disor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...chological disorder such as losing focus , reduce productivity at work. Also peopl...
^^
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ng focus , reduce productivity at work. Also people could not able to spend quality ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ngs in the world. In the era of internet , it is being widely misused as well for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92128279883 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5618236783 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597667638484 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5799798683 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412272851678 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124035967965 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812283325495 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1872297281 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553029202832 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.