Although the labour laws exist to promote well being of workers, majority of the employees end up working long hours than what they signed up for. This leaves the workers with no time for leisure activities thereby effecting health and relationships of the working people. I think such circumstances are more damaging than the incentives the employees receive.
One major disadvantage such practices come with is health problems. Be it sedentary working style or a labour intensive role, human body is not known to be capable of dealing with heavy stress. When one does not pay attention to the signs their body gives, it will only lead to the onset of lifestyle diseases like Diabetes. A recent survey by Workforce Corporation shows that 55% of the young working generations are prone to risk of heart related issues. This is majorly because employees in their early work life want to become the best and in this process, they tend to forget the importance of staying fit and healthy.
Secondly, I would like to discuss about the impact on personal relationships this choice has. Working continuously for long hours creates fatigue so such people usually don't prefer engaging in social gatherings. This creates the disturbances among friends, family. According to the Relationship experts, spending quality with one's self as well as with the close circle plays a crucial role. Furthermore, it aids in work-life balance.
To conclude, while some would want to sacrifice the personal time for short-term benefits such as quick promotions, I think one should make a conscious choice by analysing the long-term consequences of their decisions. I believe that one will be able to get convinced that dedicating too much of time to work proves to be detrimental to their well-being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... creates fatigue so such people usually dont prefer engaging in social gatherings. T...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tionship experts, spending quality with ones self as well as with the close circle p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11643835616 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77238242939 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623287671233 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.31969016 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231122486881 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694492025725 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604349832047 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13612509069 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686699330176 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.