Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages

Essay topics:

Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities.
Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages ?

It is widely accepted that these days many people work for long hours and have hardly any time for entertainment activities. In my opinion, I think merely working for a long time with less time for leisure can cause more harm to people than any benefits, it might bring.

Admittedly, there are some basic benefits to people for working long hours and having less time for leisure activities. Firstly, human beings can earn more money and satisfy their desired wants and needs. In other words, having more money in one's possession gives people enough choices to fulfill their various luxury needs. For example, according to a recent survey of people between the age of 24-32, 64% of people are ready to work for 6 days a weak to earn more and buy their favorite branded attires and various popular expensive electronic gadgets. Secondly, since some people enjoy their work, they do not intend to take leave or devote time for entertainment activities. This habit makes them work for longer hours without worrying for the time to devote to entertainment activities. Therefore, satisfying one's personal needs and having a satisfying job is a couple of reasons people indulge in working for a longer duration.

Nevertheless, despite the minimal advantages mentioned above, I think people face serious consequence by working longer and devoting less time for fun-based activities. One potential dangerous problem is that merely working without taking enough break for fun can lead to stress in human beings, as these days job involves too much of pressure which need intensive mental involvement. For instance, a majority of the population in a small town of western India regularly
suffers from depression and stress-related problems due to the law of that town to indulge people in working for 6 days a week and giving a holiday for traveling once in 2 years. Another obvious issue is that people who have less time for their hobbies and work longer are more likely to suffer in their family life. Since the most of the time is consumed at work, they get less time to spend with family; therefore, week family bonding. Thus, stress-related issues and less family touch are major issues that people face while working more and having less time for entertainment.

In conclusion, working more and spending less time for fun activities can cause serious drawbacks such as health-related issues and having week family connections which can cause more harm to people than any minor advantages it might bring.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (19 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s. In other words, having more money in ones possession gives people enough choices ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worrying about'?
Suggestion: worrying about
...akes them work for longer hours without worrying for the time to devote to entertainment act...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an any minor advantages it might bring.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05288461538 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61559229238 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2655083243 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.375 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386260028679 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160456896521 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073719952448 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243741735741 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082519335352 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.