Long working hours have become a common practice for the working-class members of society, so much so that spending time on personal interests and relaxing activities has been undermined. This essay will highlight the benefits and drawbacks of such decisions.
On the one hand, spending time at work in order to complete tasks results in appreciable outputs towards the organization’s visions and ultimately results in a promotion. Employees are assigned projects which cannot be completed within a few hours and requires dedicated lengthy hours at work, such as 9 am to 6 pm in order to reach a commendable stage. Moreover, once a project has been successfully completed, the team gets entitled to a promotion or even an appraisal. These incentives are what drive the breadwinners of each household to contribute to long work hours. In an interview with Mr. Jack Ma, the well know entrepreneur, the satisfaction of receiving benefits from his previous workplace was the driving reason for him to contribute 10 plus working hours towards his office.
On the other hand, lengthy labor hours result in the employee being exhausted and indirectly turning counterproductive. Taking part in activities that enrich the employee’s mood and bring a sense of calmness is vital to a team’s performance. But with the unavoidable work timings, people are forced to neglect the importance of such activities on their well-being and are driven into being workaholics. Forcefully extracting the nine hours from employees without counter offering any engagements for relaxation tends to bring down the overall thruput of an employee. Statistics published by the Daily Bugle Magazine of New York suggest that more than half of the population belonging to the working class are exhausted by the end of the fourth day of the week and are hardly productive on the fifth day.
In conclusion, although promotion and an appraisal are aww inspiring reasons to carry out lengthy working hours, damage to the employee’s productivity at work outweigh the benefits. In the future, the number of working hours can be reduced in order to maintain a balance between work and personal life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires dedicated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'dedicating' or 'to be dedicated'.
Suggestion: dedicating; to be dedicated
...mpleted within a few hours and requires dedicated lengthy hours at work, such as 9 am to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24068767908 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04689229875 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598853868195 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7161113274 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200969631494 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633904151913 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385497148344 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124759472229 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316172488094 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.