Although many people are aware of the side effects brought by long-time working, nowdays most of them would like to do that. Becuase there are more advantages for people if they devote more hours at work than relaxing as far as I concern.
To embark on, having free time for leisure activities is beneficial to people with jobs. They will not only have a rest in these activities, but they also restore more energy to work efficiently. Moreover, if people hang out with their colleagues or employers, their friendships can be more strengthend than others. In this case, the people could gain more success at work with their workmates' or bosses' supports.
However, working for longer time will be more advantageous than having more time to relax in this realistic society. First, they can make more money, which is the first mission for them in this eoconomy recession era. In China, especially in IT field, the programmers' salaries are leveled by their contributions on their projects, which require much time and patience. Thus, it is quite ususal for them to stay up late at companies to code applications. Most of the product managers in this field were promoted from programmers due to their previous excellent performances. Hence lots of coders follow this path to archive more success and money at work. Besides, in the US, lots of employees would like to be an Uber driver after work for more income at the moment of economy inflation.
In all, working too much will be harmful to people with jobs. for example, they will suffer from healthy issues caused by working pressures or lacking of excercise. While a majority of them knowing these disadavantages would have to work as long as they can to live a better lives or merely for survivals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... their previous excellent performances. Hence lots of coders follow this path to arch...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ch will be harmful to people with jobs. for example, they will suffer from healthy ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59077637441 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5616343324 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359223822779 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124435444246 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865049975611 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232282616645 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721359754166 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.