As some people needed to be settled down in the conutryside with new homes, some other ones argue that the protection of contryside should be valued more impoartantly. While I do not agree with this idea since the building people's new home should be solved at first in this issue. Protecting the land will bring more troubles here.
To begin with, contryside reservation is one the important policies in many countries. It not only benefits the living environment but also is a great treasure to our next generations. In the contryside where are not developed, the place is crucial in adapting weather and air quality. On the contrary, in the cities, there is not way to alternate weather due to the human developments. Aslo there are abundant natural resources in the contryside, kept as a significant source to a country.
However, people need places to live in. This is the troubles in front of many governments. If not being sovled well, the people will be angry with the government. Many of crimes would happen in this case. In China, which governments facing great presssure on rural people settlements issue, there were many riots casued by the rural people's living issue. It's a dilemma for the authorities while the first mission of them is develping their regions. As in China with hugfe landscape, the governments are always considering this issue. They also knew the contryside protection while, the people in this time comes pivotal. Because with happy people, they can have more time and energy to take care of the other part of contryside.
In all, with more people settled down, there are high possiblities to handle the contryside protection, otherwise, the protection case could not be excuted well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...sued by the rural peoples living issue. Its a dilemma for the authorities while the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99305555556 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72037033098 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.485241393 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231749335693 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662641786735 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537245581073 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12900335699 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809648322138 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.