The development of new homes is a necessary aspect of modern society, but the question of whether it is more important to protect the countryside or build new homes there is a contentious one. In my opinion, a balance must be struck between protecting the countryside and meeting the housing needs of a growing population.
On one hand, it is essential to preserve the countryside as it provides many ecological, social and cultural benefits. The countryside is home to a rich and diverse array of flora and fauna, and provides essential habitats for many species. In addition, the countryside offers a peaceful escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, and provides opportunities for recreation and leisure activities, such as hiking, camping, and fishing. Moreover, the countryside is often steeped in cultural and historical significance, and preserving these areas helps to protect our heritage and cultural identity.
On the other hand, the need for new homes is growing, and building in the countryside may be the only option available in some areas. Many people are struggling to find affordable housing, and building new homes in the countryside could help to address this issue. Additionally, the construction of new homes can stimulate economic growth and provide employment opportunities, which can be especially important in rural areas where job opportunities are limited.
In my view, the best solution is to strike a balance between protecting the countryside and building new homes. This can be achieved by developing new homes in a sustainable way, such as building eco-friendly homes and preserving green spaces. For example, in many countries, developers are required to follow strict planning regulations, which ensure that new homes are built in a way that minimizes the impact on the environment and surrounding countryside. Additionally, developers can be required to contribute to the protection and preservation of the countryside by providing funding for conservation initiatives.
In conclusion, the protection of the countryside and the need for new homes are both important, and a balance must be struck between the two. Building new homes in a sustainable way and preserving green spaces can help to ensure that the countryside is protected while meeting the housing needs of a growing population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...necessary aspect of modern society, but the question of whether it is more important to protect the cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...can be achieved by developing new homes in a sustainable way, such as building eco-friendly homes an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uck between the two. Building new homes in a sustainable way and preserving green spaces can help to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35772357724 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18768543234 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460704607046 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8200480736 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.8 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495052553909 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191983567822 0.084324248473 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107986220086 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317613091698 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897693820506 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.