In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion on this?
Masses believe regional areas should not be disturbed for development while others think there is no vacant land in urban areas for human settlement. In my opinion, rural areas should also be exposed to development. This essay will provide a detailed explanation of the benefits of development in outskirts.
In order to improve the economic growth of a nation, all of its regions need to be well equipped with basic amenities. In addition, this can only be achieved when people start living there and pay taxes in that region. For instance, Perth in Australia is a developed city as well as it has a vast landscape. In summary, every time development does not come at the cost of disturbing flora and fauna. If the government have strict environmental laws, we can achieve development as well as protect the beauty of regional areas.
Moreover, when rural areas are not exposed to development, people in these locations would never be able to compete against the generations of the urban population. This population will never get the glittery boulevard similar to downtowns. To illustrate, young children in these areas would miss meals with friends at McDonald and teenagers would never get a taste of nightlife. As a result, everybody has a right to stay close to their families as well as enjoy urbanisation in their own town.
To conclude, development should be in rural areas only after considering all environmental laws. In short, every living creature has right on Earth landscape not only humans. So, we should not occupy every bit of vacant land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefits of development in outskirts. In order to improve the economic growth ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rotect the beauty of regional areas. Moreover, when rural areas are not expos...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoy urbanisation in their own town. To conclude, development should be in ru...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in short, in summary, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80504257092 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7732928943 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0666965043788 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240890172795 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221343147492 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0416600079386 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172841253294 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.