It has been universally acknowledged that the problem of migrating from rural areas to bigger cities to make a better life is escalating at an alarming rate in the current scenario. This problem has been a depressing magnitude. Although a plethora of reasons is there yet some sensible solutions are also available to curb this grave concern.
Commencing with the causes which are responsible for the growth of it. The first reason is that people who come to cities almost do not have as much money as indigenous people of the cities. To demonstrate, most general labor is formed by migrated youth, based on academic research undertaken by the University of Sydney. The second contributing factor is education. While most rural people are active in gardening, farming, and handy jobs, many of them do not have an academic education. Conclusively, they may face or even involve in many laws and ethical crimes.
In order to solve this serious issue, some measures can be taken. Firstly, providing basic goods and equipment by the government can be beneficial for preventing people from migrating to bigger cities just because of having a better lifestyle. To illustrate, Canada’s government has provided many facilities in small cities so people who live in those areas, do not feel if they lived in bigger cities, they would have better access to such facilities. As a consequence, people can gain what they need to live their lives.
To recapitulate, unquestionably, this problem has become a burning question of the day. Therefore, it is not an easy task to solve this. The government and people should come forward to mitigate this complex issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0401459854 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81867388652 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7775912811 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220932814101 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609660814674 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636186782697 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126394733664 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075395008289 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.