Nowadays, people have to work in the different areas of the world for their bread and butter. However, there is a certain type of jobs such as engineers and doctors which are available only in the rich countries. A group of people believes that well-settled countries are stealing money by providing the demanding jobs to the people who are living in the poor country. On the other hand, some people completely opposed it. In this essay, I will discuss my disagreement with the notion and how people are supporting poop countries by getting money from the other parts of the world.
Firstly, most of the companies are situated in the wealthy nations as the government has a large amount of money to invest in the jobs which are in trend these days. In other words, the government provides funding to run these companies. However, people who are living in poor countries have no such big companies as well as government funding. Thus, they have to migrate towards rich countries for their basic needs.
Secondly, if the country has money, then they can spend it on the infrastructure such as making new roads, by advancing existing facilities at the hospitals. As a result, it will create jobs for the people who have all the required skills irrespective of their location. For instance, if a country is planning to build a massive dam, then they will need skilled engineers even if they are in their own countries or not. However, people who are living in poor countries and have engineering skills will definitely grab that opportunity. So, it will not harm its country. Since people are providing the foreign currency to their family and to the government as well in the form of income tax which will help in nurturing of the economy.
In conclusion, today, the world looks connected with the advancement in technology. People have to work in different parts to fulfill their dreams, but it is a normal behavior of workers. Moreover, rich countries are not taking money by providing jobs whereas they are giving opportunities to the talented people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6611821751 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9604500316 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229610347286 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765805217869 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571991205705 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152342129576 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630376164544 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.