Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.
To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development?
The developments in science and technology have bridged the gap between various countries and as a result the world has become a global village. While many argue that this has negative impacts on local culture and languages, I believe that the benefits in terms of increased import and export along with technological support in various fields from international communities make this development a positive one to a larger extent.
Indeed, globalisation has enabled several countries to increase consumer products' import and export. This increased trade, on the one hand, benefits the national economy by advancing the GDP that is directly proportional to the export of indigenously manufactured goods to foreign countries, while on the other hand citizens are mutually benefited with added varieties of qualitative international brands imported into local markets. Therefore, this is a win-win situation for nations as well as for the inhabitants.
It is not that only consumables have been imported, many developing countries are taking assistance from the first world countries to pave the way for development by obviating various social and technological problems. For instance, in 2011 the Indian government hired Microsoft, the tech-giant, to form a network based on the internet in order to disseminate education in the rural areas . Apparently, this type of benefits are the result of globalisation and several countries have benefited in the same way.
However, there is a concern among a few intellectuals, that globalisation is likely to diminish local cultures and languages. This seems true to some extent, as increased information technology, air transportation, and tourism, which entailed from internationalisation, have resulted an foreign exposure to local communities, and because of this, dominant foreign cultures and languages are embraced, rejecting local ones. Thus, a threat of existence has arisen in front many dialects and traditions.
Taking into account the above said arguments, I would like to conclude that, narrowing gap between international countries is largely a positive development, as nations are mutually benefited from trade and exchange of technology despite impending threats to local culture and heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Bhmkgandhi | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | harmankaur | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | harmankaur | 11 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | Kulli | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that it is better for students to study in groups, while others think it is beneficial for students to study individually.Discuss both points of view and give your opinion. 78
- The diagram below shows information about the amount of money spent on alcohol and drugs.Summarize the info by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people believe that people should marry for love others think people should marry for money Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...disseminate education in the rural areas . Apparently, this type of benefits are t...
^^
Line 8, column 285, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rom internationalisation, have resulted an foreign exposure to local communities, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, as a result, as well as, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69911504425 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24524672368 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560471976401 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.8494356888 49.4020404114 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13543401474 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052731137615 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03838482451 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07642626389 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391000305016 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.