Most people take interviews to select a person for job. What are the other ways? What do you think is the best way to recruit new employees?
In this fast paced world, competition by burgeoning by leaps and bounds, one has to undergo different examinations to get a job out of which commencing interviews is the most common one; however, there are a plethora of other factors as well through which an employer can you judge an aspiring candidate which will be elucidated in the forthcoming paragraphs.
At the outset, besides having one to one interactions, theoretical examinations can also provide assistance in assessing a candidate as one can test his cognizance about a particular subject through their writings. MCQ's and true and false, for instance, can evaluate whether a person knows the ins and outs of the subject or not which indeed can be proved advantageous for a company. What is more, group discussions can also test a job seekers ability to stand out in the crowd. To exemplify, employers want to hire someone who can convince the crowd which can be judged through this, as if a person can raise his voice and make it heard in hundreds of people. Thus, evaluating a job seeker through these, it will be much easier to select the right one for the job.
Apart from this, can one classify a certain method as the best one to shortlist candidates? I certainly do not perceive the same as for different jobs, there are different skills that are required. That is why, for recruiting someone as a sales person, he does not require any scientific knowledge but, should be good at convincing people which can be assessed by group discussions. Nonetheless, for a manager, in-depth knowledge is mandatory which should be assessed by interview and a pen and paper examinations. Hence, the best way differs according to different jobs.
To conclude, although recruiting someone for a position is an arduous task, by tests like pen and paper examinations, group discussions and interviews electing a candidate proves valuable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Arshdeepmondair | 78 | view |
- The charts below show US spending patterns from 1966 to 1996
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages 89
- Some people say it is important to keepHome and your work place tidy Everything organised and in corrected place What is your opinion about this 78
- You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect Write a letter to the editor of the magazine In your letter correct the information in the article explain why it is impor 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one interaction', 'an interaction', or simply 'interactions'?
Suggestion: one interaction; an interaction; interactions
... At the outset, besides having one to one interactions, theoretical examinations can also prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, apart from, as for, as to, for instance, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9905362776 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90777822369 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0001352813 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166480386133 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663836175554 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343597148251 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946551431304 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270916303207 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.