News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
News stories provide us information on various subjects. It is generally believed that when this news comes with images they provide more information. I opine that it is true.
Firstly, news stories provide us information about affairs of the country. For example, we are able to know the progress of the voting through the news on TV and who the leaders of the party are through the images. Secondly, we are also updated about sports that are being played in various parts of the world like the cricket match between India and Pakistan. We also recognize these players easily as we have watched them appear in the news several times.
Images with stories help us get familiar with the situations. Crime rates have increased in certain areas of Dhaka. So when a crime takes place and that appears in the pictures people become more alert when travelling through that particular area or route. For example, there has been strike in Shahbag for several days. The people who did not know the area were able to get familiar with them through medium like the tv or newspaper. Moreover, we are able to recognize celebrities and important people around the world through these images. In addition, these images supply additional information that might not have been expressed in words.
However in some scenarios the images are not sufficient to provide the details. We need the support of words to depict the situation. For example, images of a murder are generally covered so that only the face of the victim is visible. Therefore, the accompanied story helps us get a clear idea of the brutality of the crime.
In conclusion, though in some situation it is difficult to perceive the meaning of the images without the help of the stories but most of the time the images provide a clear picture of the scenarios than words itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ht not have been expressed in words. However in some scenarios the images are not su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85668789809 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45880704375 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490445859873 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8329228489 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2631578947 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163504457537 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477793257219 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384820922404 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899447584047 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310994721524 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.