Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games. However, some people think that activities are not good for a child’s mental health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Children spend their leisure time with TV and video games and it is believed by some people that kids consume their most of the time with such things and it has adverse impact on their brain. In my opinion, these technical tools help them to learn things however the addiction of this makes them lazy.
Firstly, games and television are the sources to learn new things and improve ability. Kids develop their minds by playing video games and learn to develop more skills. Interest in mind games allow them to use their mind effectively to win the game and improve their creative skills. For instance, online cheese games help them to work under pressure and increase their intelligence to new levels. Which in return can be used in real life situations. Hence, gaming and watching television is an effective way to improve the brain of a pupil.
Although, the habit of playing for long hours and addiction can create barrier to mental development. Watching TV makes a man lazy and addiction of it creates a barrier to mental development. It does not allow a kid to think beyond certain limits, which impact badly on their overall building. Therefore television should be avoided after certain hours of usage. Reports have shown that addicted to such technical tools have adverse impact on mental health of an individual and it results an isolation from the society.
In conclusion, watching TV and playing video games improves the kid’s mental ability, however the addiction to these tools show negative impacts on the same. Hence, I believe time management plays a critical role in it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rease their intelligence to new levels. Which in return can be used in real life situ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...impact badly on their overall building. Therefore television should be avoided after cert...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93680297398 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45151995938 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3906702564 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131863911746 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460204653119 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474238857535 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927243195205 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426556606477 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.