In this day and age, children are fond of using gadgets. Even parents think that it would be a precursor to excel in their academic education. Even though it has few merits in terms of formal examinations it also has some negative effects towards the kids with respect to their health and code of conduct. This essay will elucidate both sides before coming to a conclusion.
On one hand, handling gadgets which is in form of either tablets or computers or desktop from the early childhood period avenues to health disorder among the children. Many parts of their physique such as eyes, hands and legs will be affected because of the addition towards the gadgets as well as the kids who are using gadgets often show some aggressive attitudes. For instance, we notice even kinder-garden students wearing specs since their eyesight is hindered. Also, it leads them to possess some deadly effects like down-syndrome, physical disability, obesity, overweight etc. Hence, it is evident that how obsession towards tablets plays a vital role in children’s healthcare.
Conversely, parents think that when their kids make maximum utilization of technology from their young days, they tend to grasp more knowledge and will be a successful person in the future. Not only that, they will be on-par with other kids who are academically sound. For example, pediatricians say that 70% of a kid’s brain will be grown within 6 years of age. Eventually, parents want their kids to learn most of the things within that time frame so that they come out with flying colors in their formal examinations. Thus, it is proved that parents want to impose the maximum knowledge to the kid.
To sum up, even though I want to provide the most knowledge to my kid by Gadgets, I will not encourage since it has stronger negative possessions than the advantages. The disadvantages outweigh the advantages. It is my hope, parents should also consider child’s health and put forth viable solutions to avoid the gadgets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, hence, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02395209581 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74019330122 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.563198858 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7058823529 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174625220116 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565888581992 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409261961893 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981874058556 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370180978466 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.