The shocking phenomenon of changing educational pattern recently comes to forefront. Some feel that modern techniques will not have an effect on future academic career. However, I agree with those who say that new techniques will help children’s in enlighten their bright future. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both and beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on this matter.
Regarding those who feel that new technique will not help; there exists valid reason the main justification is that with new technique there is less supervision of teachers. The Alaska reported just last week that students of Alaska who studied with the help of modern techniques they scored bit less percentage.
Nevertheless, I can’t hold the opinion in good conscious because individual who used new techniques of study not only caters their study material at a short span of time; instead they come up with new automation in to the society for their betterment. The Harvard reported those Austrian citizens who take early initiative, an estimated 100,000 not only scored better grades, are now more mature. That same Harvard report mentioned that initiative of Austrian citizen proved that study through this new method foster process of children’s future academic career.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that only teaching through traditional methods helps student in the future academic carrier and pitches in, normal people like others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands how modern equipment like computers and modern tablets help student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...niques they scored bit less percentage. Nevertheless, I can't hold the opin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7842437214 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9910735834 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133285962557 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525728299704 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407373409847 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798393741037 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464503654027 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.