The world is trembling with garbage produced by humans and it seems there is no improvement in our behavious despite of constant protests from environmentalists. Ever increasing human activites for stretching their comfort zone pushing already threatened planet on erge of extinction. In this essay we will postulate various reasons for this mishap and action plan to be implemented by governments for resolving the problem.
Humans have habit of viewing development as proliferated chance for enjoyment with least concern to their surroundings. This scenario can be witnessed in various industries, especially in manufacturing and construction sectors, which are responsible for production of 60% overall commercial wastes. Similarly, in domestic garbage, house hold chores fill almost 55% of overall waste production. As this being case, urbanisation and modernaization making the problem even more sensitive. For instance, Delhi garbage land filling problem caught attention of national media where excess garbage created from city is dumped in nearby suburb causing air and ground water pollution. Consequently, population in and around city are facing difficult circumstances because of failure in garbage management system.
All that being said, this predicament is not without a solution. Effective wastage disposal system with co-operation from society is we can get out of this trouble easily. In order to proper functioning of rubbish collection, government must ensure that all household dust and waste must bifurcated as wet and dry before they are disposed. In this manner, task of recycling and using wet waste for composting will be painless for garbage collectors. On the other hand food and service sectors, which are major rubbish producers, can adopt some simple techniques like using green disposable bags instead of single use and through plastic. Likewise, local authorities can follow international guidelines recommended for better garbage discarding methods. For example, United Nations Pollution control board endorse incineration of objects at high temperatures for reducing land filling problem. Furthermore, we have Japan's composting process where garbage is degraded with help of bacteria which inturn gives us organic fertilizers used for agriculture.
After lengthy discussion, in a nutshell we can conclude the topic by saying that with dedication and perseverance we can troubleshoot the problem. All it takes is our interest for better tomorrow and effective government policies. Therefore, we can all together cross this obstacle by fighting against it unitedly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...nt as proliferated chance for enjoyment with least concern to their surroundings. This sc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f failure in garbage management system. All that being said, this predicament is...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, likewise, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75647668394 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06530441722 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647668393782 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7737333808 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143731197221 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042685598165 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338449832693 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895142857558 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288444893483 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.