Organized tours are choosing more and more to go to remote places.
DO you think this a poitive or negative development for the local peole and the environment?
More people prefer organized tours to explore remote places. This essay will discuss why, in my opinion, it is the positive development for the localities as they get financial benefits. However, the trend seems to be negative for the environment as people visiting there pollute it.
To begin with, people from remote areas get more economical benefits because of the influx of travellers. This is because people who visit remote areas will be requiring hotels and restaurants to stay and eat. As a result, not only a business opportunity but also job market flourishes. This can be exemplified from the Maldives, where million dollars are generated by the hotel industry. Besides this, most of the travellers tend to buy souvenirs, which in turns promotes local artists.
Having said that, although natives enjoy the prosperity of their village, it costs the environment. In other words, with the increasing influx of travellers, environmental exploitation is increasing. The reason is that travellers most often do not respect the environment since they are only concerned about their enjoyment. For example, in the state of Himachal Pradesh of India, which is a well-known tourist destination, air pollution is increasing every year because of the increasing travellers by cars or another mean of transportation. Furthermore, travellers most often dump plastic items such as cutlery bottles and napkins in remote areas, which increases plastic pollution in the area. Hence, environment pollution is the result of travellers who exploit the environment for their luxury and enjoyment.
To conclude, I believe that the more travellers result in increased income for the localities, whereas the environment has to pay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-30 | ekjotsingh | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...with, people from remote areas get more economical benefits because of the influx of trave...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...be exemplified from the Maldives, where million dollars are generated by the hotel indu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, as to, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42750929368 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96545246476 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9930786807 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21957221555 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739718222661 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654373486445 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15341067556 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797986240626 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.