Today we are living in the 21st century and out of 70%, almost 40% of people are having their own vehicles. Due to the problem of traffic congestion and environmental pollution, there should be one car for each house. I am totally in the favor of the motion that presently it is damn easy to purchase any new vehicle because of anonymous fiance option and easy criteria. It's like a marathon is going on these days who has more than 1 vehicle.
To begin with, there are alternatives through which you can reach your destinations at an appropriate time. For instance, Metro Rails in Delhi, Uber sharing cabs and much more, then why there is always a dependency on individual vehicles? According to the recent surveys, there is a hike of 45% pollution as compared to the last year and due to this climate is also impacting and resulting in global warming. On the first side, we should buy only limited vehicles only when it's like an imperative for anyone. Secondly, always plan your travel in advancement to avoid last minute gridlocks. The advantages of this point of view are thus very clear.
Another problem is undoubtedly the pollution, comprises in the form of air and noise. The chemical substance which comes out from the vehicles is not only harming weather or climate but also simulating the health diseases in the human body. For illustration, you will see a plethora of new diseases impacting the life of an individual. It is thus understandable why many minds are supporters if this is the position.
The best way to overcome this problem is through restrictions of owning one vehicle for each household. Carpooling is very common these days where people going to same place share vehicle. They can do so instead of traveling in individual cars. Besides carpooling, people can use public transport, it will not only help financially troubled public transport sector but will also create a competition which in turn will improve quality of these vehicles as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86390532544 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71204159941 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6027123098 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130787080897 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395431760426 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557375599042 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07588550978 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310824691607 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.