Animals are among the imperative creatures on this planet which plays are a vital role to sustain the life cycle. We can't bind the people who say zoos should abandon by animals because they live there in cruelty and on the other side some human being might think zoos should be there to preserve animals life more securely.
As many argue, fostering the zoo for animals is not a right choice for individuals. There are several merits to this position. For one, they will not get an ample amount of food to eat and that too is not clean which will affect their lives to reduce their lifespan. In India, for example, a tremendous amount of money is deploying for a healthy lifestyle of animals but eventually because of intermediate rascals, nothing left and they will get just waste. This stuff gives a plethora of negative thinkings to the people's mind. The advantages of this point of view are thus very clear.
Other people, nevertheless, feel animals are quite safe in zoos and as compared to the outer world. For instance, cow, hard to resist that people eat cow's flesh, even after knowing that we Indian's pray as holy spirit cow. India is up and up running every day. It is thus understandable why many minds are supporters if this position.
The above discussion illustrates how nuances between the mindsets of the people make it implausible to change the mindsets. Zoos are thus the best place to keep the animals safe and secure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ital role to sustain the life cycle. We cant bind the people who say zoos should aba...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71936758893 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41844914128 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9539073261 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2857142857 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218466586493 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676398648647 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866275502858 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136537355658 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633454971142 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.