People think that old buildings should be knocked down and given way to the new buildings. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? how important are old buildings to us?
Different buildings have different lifespans and values depending upon the weather, geological constraints and construction norms of a country. Tearing down old buildings indiscriminately and without understanding the real worth of them will be over the top. i agree with this statement partly, as described below.
Some old buildings have intrinsic value. they are a perfect reflection of the history and civilization. Every city needs old buildings to maintain a sense of heritage and permanency. People and tourists take pleasure witnessing the aesthetic and cultural history of a particular area. There is no doubt old buildings attract people because of their architectural marvelous , unique shapes and warmth. therefore, there is no other alternative, but to preserve them at any cost because of their historic significance.
In contrast, each old building may not be the perfect candidate for conservation. the above -mentioned buildings signify heritage properties, monuments, buildings representing the center of attractions and are of special values. Other buildings which are in a dilapidated condition or awkwardly blocking the urban development need to be knocked down if they were meant to be for the renewed needs of the city. for example, the civic authority must tear down those buildings that pose a threat to people who live in them and pedestrians owing to its poor condition and low quality construction.
I assert that new buildings make sense for certain business, and there is no denying. However, i also believe that restaurants, pubs, bookstore, galleries, small start-ups and even some banks thrive in old buildings.
In conclusion, it is the civic authority or any other concerned department that as to assess whether a building needs to be demolished or not.old buildings that carry the special value should be conserved for various benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...eal worth of them will be over the top. i agree with this statement partly, as de...
^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...eal worth of them will be over the top. i agree with this statement partly, as de...
^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ome old buildings have intrinsic value. they are a perfect reflection of the history...
^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...because of their architectural marvelous , unique shapes and warmth. therefore, th...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...l marvelous , unique shapes and warmth. therefore, there is no other alternative, but to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the perfect candidate for conservation. the above -mentioned buildings signify heri...
^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...o be for the renewed needs of the city. for example, the civic authority must tear ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, even so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47422680412 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10441569239 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2356816115 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353410660736 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112766335238 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064287628816 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190274148941 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357299245628 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.