Plastic bags, bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment.
What damage does plastic do to the environment?
What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?
The environment has been damaged by human-produced plastic products such as bottles, bags, and packaging. All the ecosystems on the Earth are becoming polluted. It is threatening the survival of aquatic and terrestrial animals and plants. There are vast solutions for this phenomenon which the governments and individuals can do.
Plastic waste contaminates the environment progressively and puts its inhabitants in danger of extinction. Traditionally, human beings have been disposing of their garbage in a place far away from their residing area; that was not an issue unless plastics arose. These kinds of materials are not to dissolve in nature, so by increasing the usage of plastics, our environment plays the role of a huge bin which never goes empty. Creatures other than humans are now trying to survive in a dangerous place armed with brutal traps. Various reports show birds or smaller animals are dying of plastic foreign body ingestion. Sea creatures are trapped in a bottle or bag, waiting for their death. Simultaneously, plants are becoming less populated because they are primarily dependent on other animals suffering from pollution to start their reproduction cycle. This crucial issue could be addressed partially by some efforts from the governments and individuals.
There are two approaches to decrease the side effects of plastics on the environment, reducing plastic distribution and collecting accumulated ones from oceans and onshore areas. The governments can set rules to reduce using plastics. Putting a tax on sellers and retailers could make them lower the usage of plastic bags and packaging and raise the price of these items to make customers use baskets rather than plastic bags, such as what happened in the UK a couple of years ago, and also, use less processed foods which require packaging. On the other hand, individuals can make use of bottles in different ways to reduce waste. Joining NGOs specializing in environmental issues is a practical way to clean the environment from harmful garbage. Happy to say, these kinds of voluntary works are becoming more trending today, and everyone could do the duty of protecting the Earth and its inhabitants to some extent.
I believe plastic-made wastes irreversibly influence the whole ecosystem by putting the creatures in danger of extinction. I think it should be a global concern for both people and governments to immediately apply some solutions to this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28388746803 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95138227084 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585677749361 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8385843302 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328679205694 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835284838308 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621872062556 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19402516303 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402946601265 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.