Is this a positive or negative developmentIs that governments spend a huge amount of money building public transport? Discuss both sides
Transportation methods have changed drastically these days. Lots of nations have allocated an extra budget to enhance their public transportation. However, the question of whether such an investment in this field has a positive or negative impact on individuals is arguably the most debatable one. This essay aims to discuss this interesting topic in further detail and before coming to a conclusion.
To begin with, there is no doubt that public transportation has provided a plethora of great benefits to people. Firstly, it participates conspicuously in lessening local pollution and traffic congestion. To illustrate, using different options of public transportation allow individuals to get rid of using their private vehicles in their daily basis. As a result of this move, the amount of fossil fuel that used by their cars will be reduced dramatically and lead to alleviating pollution. Secondly, using public transportation might increase people’s productivity. To elaborate, commuters who spend a long time to reach their destinations can utilize their time by reading, learning or even relaxing which’s not applicable if they are driving.
On the flip side, public transit has some drawbacks for people. First of all, the trips schedule and route are fixed. This issue in fact makes this option inappropriate for many people who would like to reach their destination without passing all stop points that buses or metro do. Finally, there is no privacy in public transportation. In other words, many strangers might hear your phone conversation or even look at your mobile screen and you can do nothing for that.
To sum up, although public transit might has offered poor privacy as well as inconvenient trip schedule, I wholeheartedly believe that it’s the cheapest, most comfortable and safest option to many individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...e their public transportation. However, the question of whether such an investment in this field has a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tail and before coming to a conclusion. To begin with, there is no doubt that pu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, in fact, no doubt, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44636678201 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12616305388 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653979238754 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5193628298 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186015295962 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056601743332 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037833260217 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097496162707 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509040559878 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.