Balanced existence of people of all ages is indispensable in order to main the cultural cycle. However, in some countries, the population of youngsters is comparatively more than those of old folks. This essay will discuss why the advantages of having more adults as compared to old ones do in fact outweigh disadvantages.
There are two major benefits occurring from more young population. Firstly, the future of a nation is in the hands of its young-lings; either they can construct it or destroy it. This is because, more young adults means more young potential with new ideas, creativity and deep technical knowledge. This will help the country to develop worldwide in every field and increase the global value. For instance, all the scientists who launched Chandryan2 from ISRO, India, were youngsters and there was no older person helping them. They themselves performed all the experiments with new techniques and the result can be seen now. Moreover, low population of older persons means less need of medical facilities. It is because older people are more prone to diseases as compared to young ones. Government, thus, can save money which can be used in the development of a country in the field of education, science, housing, et cetera. That is why, the low population of such people is considered to be positive.
On the contrary, this might also create a problem in a nation because more the number of youngsters means more the requirement of educational facilities like schools, colleges, universities, et cetera. In order to run these educational institutes, there will be a lack of trained and scholar teachers, being the population of matured people to be low. Thus, old people play a role as important as young ones in order to build the future of a country.
In conclusion, number of youngsters is more than elders in some countries. However, in my opinion, even though problems might arose for the educational institutes due to more youngsters, yet I believe that it can take a country towards its bright future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...destroy it. This is because, more young adults means more young potential with new ide...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 659, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... now. Moreover, low population of older persons means less need of medical facilities. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01179941003 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87496989882 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542772861357 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8916407614 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3888888889 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159964703384 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518924114776 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040529170994 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991027645922 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288069708718 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.