In the current competitive scenario, the number of jobless people is inclining with a great pace. In some countries, certain folks are in favor that government is doing well by giving money to such people every week to earn their livelihood, while others are against it. This essay will discuss both the views in details and provide evidence as to why cash should not be given to work-less.
The major reason why people consider this activity of the government to be acceptable is that it can help the needy ones to earn their basic necessities like food, shelter, et cetera. Many people are being out of job due to lack in career opportunities and vacancies, which makes it difficult for them and their families to survive. For instance, the living condition and survival rates are actually miserable in the countries which do not offer money to its jobless individuals as compared to the countries that do. That is why; this action plays a vital role in improving the living standards of unemployed people of a particular region.
On the contrary, a bunch of people believe that this activity should not be performed as it may lead to loss of motivation in unwaged community to find a job. More the help provided by the government in the form of currency on a regular basis, less are the efforts made by unemployed to get a job for their worth living. For example, number of adults in countries with this help is increasing considerably because they are more dependent on it rather than their own hard work. Thus, the money provided by government of a country may be proven to be fatal for its own future; which is in the hand of its population.
In conclusion, this essay argued why administration should not help the unemployed folks by giving them a weekly amount of money. In my opinion, this money could be used for the betterment of other people like disabled, needy, medically unfit, et cetera.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cash should not be given to work-less. The major reason why people consider thi...
^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...t can help the needy ones to earn their basic necessities like food, shelter, et cetera. Many peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73273273273 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64560644611 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.4502647596 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315971553377 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111753297161 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648677769941 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211811579969 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766476904692 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.