When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks and sports facilities, rather than shopping centers for people to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this contemporary world of modernization, construction of towns with modern facilities is increasing rapidly. While planning the designs of new buildings, it is suggested that a plenty of space should be provided in favor of more parks and sports zone rather than shopping centers. This essay will argue as to why constructing gardens is more prominent than shopping stores.
There are two major reasons why more recreation grounds should be built. Predominantly, parks are a good source of entertainment because people can perform exercise in their free time and meet new individuals with same interest. For instance, in my hometown, Amritsar, there is a park named Company Bagh which provides great facilities like walking lanes and exercising machines for adults, swings for children, sitting benches, et cetera, due to which around 1200 folks of all ages schedule their visit here on daily basis. Secondly, these ensure the good look of a particular place because of its plantations. Thus, parks influence the moods and health of a person and enhance beauty of the town to a greater extent.
However, construction of shopping malls is also necessary because they are a major source of employment to unemployed. Moreover, if there will be no shopper stops in the town, people will have to commute to far places in order to buy their daily necessities. That is why, masses will never choose to live in a town without any facility. In addition, such stores are also a good source of recreation to the people. So, the importance of malls cannot be neglected in any way.
In conclusion, this essay argued why more parks are needed to be constructed. In my opinion, advantages of establishing more parks outweigh that of shopping centers in many ways.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03436426117 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83203630138 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0341028586 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239491728935 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687290075438 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527875631783 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136519465809 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390929322948 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.