Scientific findings have clearly indicated that the excessive consumption of fast food by people is deteriorating their health. Some folks opine that educating public can be a possible solution for this problem while others do not. This essay will discuss both the views in details and provide evidence as to why educating people can be helpful in convincing them to eat a limited quantity of junk food.
Certain people believe that the mindset of individuals can be shifted from eating less junk food to more dietary food by the means of education. Firstly, there are numerous items falling in the category of fast food which do not give any information regarding their ingredients and its amount. And by teaching the society about harmful effects of these different ingredients like cholesterol, fats, sodium et cetera, their mind can be shifted. Secondly, the education at schools can help to form healthy eating habits among students and parents. For instance, schools should allot a definite meal for each day of a week; it would help students to consume healthy diet and parents to prepare it. Thus, education can be helpful in declining the intake of fast food by the people.
However, a bunch of people opine that education can do nothing in this case because no one gives any preference to the roadside bill-boards of education due to their hectic life schedule. Folks, being aware of ill effects of this food, will persist to eat it being convenient and time-saver. In addition, it provides a wide range of items with extravagant taste as compared to that of healthy food. Moreover, healthy food is commonly inferior to fast food in terms of taste and prices as a matter of fact. As a result, however convincing education is, it is almost impossible for people to change their eating habit without a ready alternative to their unhealthy food choices.
In conclusion, different people have have different opinions. However, I opine that education can be helpful in changing the eating habits of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...ices. In conclusion, different people have have different opinions. However, I opine th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... In conclusion, different people have have different opinions. However, I opine th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99702380952 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65297124907 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0320723588 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296135437395 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103487831169 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685493644268 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203811915111 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811948801658 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.