Professional sports people are often idolised by young children. Some people think that they, therefore, have a responsibility to be good role models at all times for children. Do you agree or disagree?
Sports professionals have been customarily followed by young generation for personal and physical appearance. Due to this, several people anticipate that these sportsmen are responsible for being an idol throughout their life. However, people with dissimilar thoughts believe that sportsmen should not be completely responsible for youngster’s greater good. Are only sports people responsible for youngsters well-being? A thorough scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one side over the other, I prefer to present a counterbalanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, there are some reasons why sports people have responsibility in shaping up the new generations. However, there should be some alternate precautions needs to be taken from youngsters and their parents. The subsequent two paragraphs will details both constituents extensively.
First and foremost, professional sportsmen have tremendous influence on teenagers. The way sportsmen live is always closely absorbed by youngsters. The prime reason behind it is, the children have impressional minds. Furthermore, influences from sports people also impact the young one to mimic the activities performed by them. For instance, teenagers in India follows Virat Kohli in such a way that when he promoted a baked snack, the demand for the same snack increased drastically.
On the contrary, children should have their own cognitive skills to identify the difference between acceptable and unacceptable. Young generation must only acquire appropriate things which are beneficial for their future. As an individual, each and everyone has freedom to live their own life and importantly, we cant force someone to behave nicely each and every time they are in public. For example, we cant mimic Lionel Mess blindly if he starts taking drugs in public. Its also the parents responsibility to tell their children what is proper.
Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, contributing to youngsters healthy future is evident. However, youth’s own grasping capability of differentiating between good and band is well worthy of equivalent consideration. As is most of the things in mind, there are two sides to the matter. In this case, both the things are constructive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'detail'
Suggestion: detail
...nts. The subsequent two paragraphs will details both constituents extensively. First...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...live their own life and importantly, we cant force someone to behave nicely each and...
^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ime they are in public. For example, we cant mimic Lionel Mess blindly if he starts ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ly if he starts taking drugs in public. Its also the parents responsibility to tell...
^^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...ts taking drugs in public. Its also the parents responsibility to tell their children w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eir children what is proper. Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, contribu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59714285714 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20025636728 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9999085309 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1739130435 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2173913043 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28037937992 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712220552363 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673506099506 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136682858562 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745085294902 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.