Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
Everyone knows proliferation of high tech media has improved our lives in many ways. Mainly by improving the accessibility for information with in less time. High tech media is more advance in entertainment, attraction and in functionality than books. This essay discusses the importance of high tech media for public libraries to survive.
To begin with, most of us know that latest high tech media can give a very different user experience than a physical book. As an example a video or DVD provides visual effect as well as sound simultaneously. This is very close to real life experience. It also can contain lot of data with in very tiny container which help to save the space. Also electronic resources can be shared among huge users which is not possible with a paper based book. This result in less capital cost to manage high tech media.
Secondly, Users have to wait around a year to get a new version of a book. But, in electronic world updated information is accessible at anytime from anywhere. Therefore, library should get the computer literacy to update themselves to provide better service for their users.
Furthermore, it is a common practice to share library information with other libraries through the internet. If a book is not available in one library, then the borrower can search in another library using this facility. After that, can request to transfer the book to particular library.
In conclusion, I would like to say, considering all the above benefits its really necessary to use high tech media with in the library.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...container which help to save the space. Also electronic resources can be shared amon...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252595155709 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.128027681661 0.155533422707 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121107266436 0.0946595960268 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0622837370242 0.0501214627716 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0276816608997 0.0437548338989 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128027681661 0.122226691241 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0242214532872 0.0403226058552 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80036427825 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0484429065744 0.0326793684256 148% => OK
Particles: 0.00346020761246 0.00163938923432 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.0865051903114 0.0861772015684 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0242214532872 0.021408717616 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00692041522491 0.011925033212 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1559.0 1933.35771543 81% => OK
No of words: 262.0 316.048096192 83% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95038167939 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31679389313 0.374742101984 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24427480916 0.28420135186 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187022900763 0.203846283523 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129770992366 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80036427825 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.56093040696 112% => OK
Word variations: 69.8027943142 60.7387585426 115% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.4117647059 20.7743622355 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3798185826 49.517814964 47% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 127.492653851 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7743622355 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.814263465372 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 39.8392456219 49.1944974215 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.85714285714 1.69124875643 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126059397487 0.332605444948 38% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0792080101465 0.102741220458 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0683989988295 0.0668466124924 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5252513974 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165885836593 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487902046142 0.134430193775 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471541966024 0.0742795772207 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.252893399545 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0414403057847 0.0638462369009 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738297321879 0.228012699653 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437156928567 0.058150111329 75% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.4468937876 57% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.8426966292 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.