As per my viewpoint, rich countries should give financial aid to developing or under-developed countries. This financial aid will help the poorer countries in expanding their infrastructure. This aid further can be used in providing medical facilities to the people of the country. Secondly, this aid will give boost to the social-economic growth as well.
The receiving nation should use this financial wisely. They should invest this money into areas in which their country is lagging. I would like to quote a recent development that happened in my country, India. With complete support from Japan, the Bullet Train project was launched in recently. This project is full funded by our counterpart. It will generate
employment right from day one of its' inception. People will be trained to use advance technology involved with bullet trains. Enough jobs will be generated during the construction phase of the project. Such kind of jobs will help the unemployed in earning a respectable money needed to get basic necessities of living. With the monthly salary payouts, their families will be able to get good education and medical facilities as well. Such projects thus help in building a healthier society.
I would like to state in the end that such financial relationships often lead to building a healthier and competitive world, where-in people from different walks-of life can grow and contribute towards a healthier nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...rning a respectable money needed to get basic necessities of living. With the monthly salary payo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28384279476 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92391912102 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598253275109 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2474123351 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.625 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3125 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183071477825 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651378241038 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970173878416 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11332413552 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109700798708 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.