SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITIES STUDENTS LEARN LESSON FAR BETTER FROM THEIR TEACHERS THAN FROM OTHER SOURCES, SUCH AS THE INTERNET AND T.V. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE.
There is no doubt that education has changed since the introduction of the internet and television. Some people believe that online learning is much better than offline learning. I partly agree with the above notion and I will elaborate on the reasons for my partial agreement in the subsequent paragraphs.
Let us begin by looking at the advantages of acquiring knowledge through e-learning and television. The first and foremost merits are that visual means offer a more diverse method of learning in terms of timing and location. With the evolvement of technology and availability of the internet at every nook and corner, adolescents are able to get better knowledge at any place or at any time. As a result, it can save time as well as money while commuting and you can fulfil your family commitments. To illustrate, a recent survey conducted by The Times of India, reveals that 32 % of online students has been increased in the last five years.
Turning to the other side, teachers have been playing a significant role in making a career since ancient times. Teachers' expertise is still required for all students, especially at the elementary level. Moreover, face-to-face interaction is only possible in classroom teaching. The instructor can not only give feedback but also give the emotional touch to the children. In addition, there are many practical subjects, which students can learn better from the lecturer. For example, Physics and Chemistry experiments are better learned by the help of the instructor. Besides this, a professor can inspire and motivates teenagers.
It is fair to conclude that although digital methods of learning are far better than traditional learning yet we cannot ignore the role of the tutor in the development of students. Ergo, in my opinion, teacher and online learning both play an indispensable role in the multidimensional advancement of youngsters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 446, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ical subjects, which students can learn better from the lecturer. For example, Physics...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21498371336 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94380809019 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625407166124 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6767948773 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186734383892 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512304828511 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480575150984 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104958708643 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255399069807 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.