Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
There are different approaches by which criminals can be punished. Although the prisons have been considered as a severe punishment, they cannot be quite effective as many as the education and job training. It appears that both the education and training are most efficient. I will explain why in this essay.
Firstly, the governments can employ the criminals in various positions meaning that those who commit a crime usually need to learn how to use their skills and abilities in a correct way. Thus, if the states spend the maintenance of prisons' costs on educating criminals, the criminals will be able to change into individuals who are more beneficial to their societies. In addition, a second and perhaps most significant benefit of the training and employing them as workforces is that the governments can implement some projects such as community services with no extra expenditure. This means that criminals must do these types of projects instead of staying in the prison. As a result they do not have to be paid the salary because it is just their penalty.
It is true that for some crimes such as murder should be considered severe penalties so that it can be said that the education is not efficient in order to punish them. Despite this, it seems that according to some research, those who just have been sentenced for sending to prison would often commit the same crime after coming back to societies. This is because they mostly need to be taught about how they can have a normal lifestyle like others.
To conclude, the prisons have been considered as a method to deal with criminals. However, it seems to me that considering some centers in which criminals could be educated about different types of job according to their abilities can be more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | nazirsumra | 78 | view |
- Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 96
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 77
- An old friendis coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema Write to your friend In your letter Explain that you are unable to come Find out how long your friend is stayingin town Arrange a suitable time to meet 78
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. why is this happening? what will be the effects of it on the family and Society? 78
- You have a pen friend living in another country and her/ he curious to learn about the major buildings in your country. Write a letter to your pen friend. In your letter:Greet your friend and say why you are writingBriefly describe a recently built archit 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a correct way" with adverb for "correct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n how to use their skills and abilities in a correct way. Thus, if the states spend the maintena...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91721854305 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68301227875 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9059028089 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193055617465 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705219639237 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449072911953 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125660706776 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363762946158 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.