Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is some scientific evidence showing that eating junk food could be harmful to human's health. A number of people believe that the educational programs can be effective to prevent people from eating junk food. However, this idea is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, the opponents of the educational programs as an efficient approach point that because of some changes which have occurred in lifestyle recently, people tend to eat prepared food. This group indicates that the most important reason is the fast-paced life in which people have to work hard all day long, so they do not pay enough attention to food's health. Thus, the education system cannot work in this field due to the fact that the lifestyle must be changed.
By contrast, those who support producing educational programs about the risks of overeating junk food cite the various benefits. These range from raising public awareness to decrease in the illnesses rate. If people are warned about the dangers of overusing fast food, they will concern more about their health. Subsequently, individuals try to prepare homemade dishes more which are significantly healthier than prepared ones. Examples can be seen in people who have chosen vegetarianism recently because they have realized the key role of eating vegetables in healthy life via education. In addition, another argument is that when people gain more information about good nutrition, the societies face serious diseases less.
On balance, Although some believe that education cannot be enough efficient to prevent people from eating fast food, it seems obvious that a good education is one of the best approaches to warn people in this case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-15 | mani223 | 87 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- You have a pen friend living in another country and her/ he curious to learn about the major buildings in your country. Write a letter to your pen friend. In your letter:Greet your friend and say why you are writingBriefly describe a recently built archit 73
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- You recently organized an all- day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch. Write a letter t 73
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- Write a letter to invite your friend to a music concert you are planning to go You should write What is the concert of the music concert When and where is the music concert Why do you think your friend will go to this concert 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approaches to warn people in this case.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20274914089 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63862483521 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8743417871 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386717174833 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133657003682 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112981182753 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264181817028 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079760646773 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.