A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking, washing and other household uses.
Why do many countries face water shortages, and what could be done to alleviate the problem?
These days, the lack of water is threatening to many regions of the world. Some ecologists state that countries should urgently cope with this phenomenon because the problem with water is getting worse day by day. In this essay, I will discuss the main reasons and purpose possible solutions.
One of the biggest reasons is that people tend to overuse water. For many, families make use of water when it would better to turn off the tap. For example, excessive use of water usually happens if people brush their teeth and forget to turn off the tap, so they squander it in large amounts as a habit. The way forward might be for the government to encourage households to use water rationally. To put it another way, officials should launch advertising campaigns teaching citizens to take care of water and change their wasteful habits. As a result, water consumption would drop considerably, and it would ease the problem with water shortage.
Another reason is that industries often dispose of toxic waste into water resources. In other words, they have a tendency to collect chemicals, which come from production as a side effect, in the local reservoirs and sometimes empty them illegally into the environment, especially into rivers, because the waste usually dissolves quickly in the liquid, and, therefore, it is difficult to find the offender. As a consequence, the potable water can become seriously polluted and dangerous to use. Addressing this problem involves deterring polluters from dumping chemicals into water with heavy fines and making them install filters.
To sum up, there is no doubt that water scarcity is usually caused by people and industries. However, I think that this issue can be tackled if the officials take the above-mentioned measures. Otherwise, countries will eventually face an acute lack of water in cities and outflow of population in search of water.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, no doubt, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10610932476 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6894948626 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3111169491 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281654792254 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942704172345 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597670026718 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162695848869 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370181404027 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.