Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?

Wealthy nations are getting richer and richer while the poor nations are sinking deep into poverty. These days the hotly debated concept of - "equality of wealth" is loosely used, and is not necessarily practiced by everyone. Although, not every nation can provide its citizen with high end luxuries, people deserve to be provided with basic facilities like food, water and education. This essay will discuss that it is the responsibility of all governments especially, wealthy nations to ensure that no person is deprived of these basic facilities.

To begin with, the primary responsibility of the government of poorer nations is to look after the health and well being of their citizens themselves. However, in case of a crisis or due to shortage of funds a call for help can be made to the wealthy nation. For instance, when multitudes of people in Africa resorted to eating mud as they were dying of starvation and malnutrition, wealthy nations likes America and Canada provided immediate aid. Along with providing clean drinking water and food; computer camps were set up and volunteers were flown to teach the children computer skills.

Nations blessed with abundance should not forget the downtrodden nations and should to share their resources among the less privileged. However, can the onus be entirely put on them? No! All governments are bound by duty to take care of the needs of their citizens. During wars people expect rich countries to welcome the refugees without considering the impact it will have on their economy and society at large. Therefore, wealthy nations should not be exploited for personal gains.

To conclude, keeping political differences and geographical boundaries aside, nations should ensure no one goes to bed on an empty stomach! I believe sharing of resources helps in bridging the gap and makes the world a better place to live in for everyone.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16504854369 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76747874529 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9066773215 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442345386705 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142358250542 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110853059162 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23963175826 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824014645089 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.