As the curfew policy on teenagers is imposed in some places of the US, I totally agree with this policy in that it protect a majority of juveniles' safety in this country, even with the cost of losing freedom at nights.
To begin with, not every place in US is safe for teenagers. As we are searching the crime rate on the app "Zillow", the rates vary significanly by different regions. If the teenagers living in the high crime rate area go out at night alone, they would be more easily harmed by others no matter young or old. Besides, the Amber Alert, alarmed every one with cellphones if a single boy or girl missed or kidnaped anywhere of the US. The protection of the young people is always the first concern in this country.
Additionaly, as the Amber Alert warning us, not only the young people get lost in the high crime area, but also it is a national issue of juveniles' safety that all the individuals living in US should take responsibilities. Thus curfew policy will help to protect the youth efficiently as most of them are safe at schools in the day. The teenagers would have more security assurance.
Furthermore, curfew is not only a protection of youth, but also a good chance improve the family relationship not matter at home or accopanied with adults mainly from their families. Parents after work at night would have more time to communicate with their children. They could got out togehter for fun instead of the children going out alone.
In all, in the US, I totally agree with this curfew policy on children in that the young generation would be more safe at night. Moreover, this is also a family time for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ing in US should take responsibilities. Thus curfew policy will help to protect the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...unicate with their children. They could got out togehter for fun instead of the chi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6462585034 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63997294884 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7285695975 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244738843832 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828113714962 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558531476959 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148484615838 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328746509932 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.