Twentieth century is a fast-paced culture and no one seems to getting a minute for themselves. Recent studies on food industry are indicating that, of late people have been consuming a lot of fast food because they do not have the time. In some countries, especially in developed countries, people are suffering from health problems because of consuming too much fast food.
Eating fast food like pizza, burger or noodles can cause Diabetes, high cholesterol, heart and respiratory problems. In recent times, there has been huge demand from social activities on government to increase the taxes on fast food. This way, we could possibly drive them to have healthy diet rather than junk food. However, it seems to be unfair. Apart from the reason stated above, there could be several other reasons why people are consuming more fast food. If we look into the socio-economic group, the poor people consume more fast food because it is lot cheaper than buying organic or healthy diet food products. Increasing taxes on this kind of food could really affect the families of the poor.
Countries like USA, Australia and Belgium spend major share from their agriculture budget to promote a healthy diet in society. It is an excellent step in increasing the healthy lifestyle of people. However, on the other hand, the governments can provide subsidiaries on organic food items. This way, the prices of healthy food products can be reduced. Because of this, people will stop buying fast food and enjoy the luxury of organic foods.
To conclude, imposing a higher tax on food items will not benefit the poor people and I do not think it is a good idea. Rather, I suggest providing subsidiaries on organic food items and try to educate the people on health diet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...se the taxes on fast food. This way, we could possibly drive them to have healthy diet rather ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, really, so, apart from, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92255892256 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51578472055 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7035157979 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362319387717 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121045406178 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820907417056 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224207906311 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490806675879 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.