It is ubiquitous that technological evolution has brought drastic changes in the digital age. As a result of this in-person conversations would demise in the future. In my view, the latest forms of message delivery mechanism will eclipse traditional methods.
Face to face communication has been seen as a conventional conversation method and it will help in improving the bonding in any relation. Nonetheless, in the modern era mobiles are not only affordable and but also one of the end needs. Moreover, it has reached each and every corner of the world and created a sophisticated platform to connect with friends and family quickly. Due to this both telecommunication and internet talking has been mushroomed. For instance, connecting through different social media platform giants such as Face book and WhatsApp has been increased in recent years.
On top of this, globalization has created more and more job opportunities throughout the world and most of these jobs require traveling from one place to another. This would be a setback to have direct communication. Instant communication tools have helped in eliminating the travel time to deliver a message. Thus, it is considered both an economical and time-saving method. In addition to this, to inform about the emergency situation the majority of people depend on digital platforms such as calling or texting rather than eyeball to eyeball.
It is an unarguable fact that direct contact has a huge positive impact on relations. Nevertheless, this form of conversation will be replaced by online conveying methods because of various factors such as affordable and less time-consuming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ght drastic changes in the digital age. As a result of this in-person conversation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34099616858 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1704141624 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63601532567 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.865159704 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145114977589 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041398348255 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553067727669 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717825468441 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552058198556 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.