While it is undeniably true that mushrooming of juvenile crime is directly associated with the increase of violent content in the mainstream media, some people are of the opinion that these sorts of crimes are related to the significant number of other factors. Although I agree that media is largely responsible to provoke violent tendencies in children's minds, I think some factors such as family disputes and friendship with notorious people are also playing a crucial role.
On one hand, different forms of media including print, electronic are directly cultivating a variety of thoughts over crime. In other words, these are elaborating and demonstrating the entire crime scenes in their analysis programs and it profoundly impacts the viewers. Nowadays, unfortunately, a large proportion of the audience is children. For example, a world-renowned TV show telecasts a program between 8.30 pm to 9.30 pm and it majorly focuses and gives step by step approach of that particular incident.
On the other hand, internal disputes in the family could cause to develop felonious nature in youngsters. To cast some light into this, kids tend to learn from their parents and during the process of domestic violence, they would learn and enjoy bad qualities such as beating, abusing and torturing people. In addition to that, forging a friendship with evildoers also an important factor to consider. For instance, statistics show that 34% of the younger generation was spoiled by the degenerates.
To conclude, though I agree that the media is playing a crucial role in developing cruel nature, I think family disputes and being friends with the bad people are also enhancing the crime thoughts among the kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...rnal disputes in the family could cause to develop felonious nature in youngsters. To cast...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23636363636 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82120893142 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.710101627 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157337990099 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051920036062 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05235039873 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959751981631 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448329828356 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.