Some people choose to eat no fish or meat. They believe that this is not better for your own health but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss these view and give your own opinion.

Having a healthy diet, is very important to any human being. In our daily diet, we should include enough protein, vitamins and nutrition values according to our body weight. Few people argue that, eating vegetarian food and avoiding meat or fish will be a healthy choice. However, in my opinion, animal products produce more protein than vegetable diet. In this essay, I am going to discuss about both pros and cons of different kind of food habits.
In terms of nutrition values considered, animal food products are the best source for gaining protein, which is very essential for growth of children. Although, protein can be obtained from different sources of food, animal food is considered most important origin. For that reason, removing meat or fish from the diet could be harmful to our body, if we do not replace it with enough protein.
In other hand, vegetarians do believe that consuming animal food can lead to global warming and it will affect the equilibrium of our world. However, there is no proven theory or stats are available to support their statement. Vegetarians also argue that, producing different kinds of animal food require plenty of natural resource, which are scarce. Compared to production of vegetable products, animal products are more effective in terms of resources used like water. For example, hydroponic vegetable require more water.
In conclusion, people choose not to eat meat or fish could provoke negative effect on the health and it does not guarantee a positive results on the sustainability of our environment. In my view, having a balanced diet with enough neutrinos will help us to live long and animal food products is the best source for health diet and animal food will be a good way to maintain equilibrium of our world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00337837838 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5816625035 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8735663104 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120773063209 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440407771804 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412080267078 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816805062067 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032545232618 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.