Of late, practical learning has been playing a vital role in pupils' studies and at the same time, it opened the doors for a new debate. Few might argue that experimental training should be implemented at schools while others believe that pen and paper teaching could be advantageous. In my opinion, example-based schooling is an effective way.
To embark upon, the digital age has brought a whole new dimension in many sectors and education is not an exception to it. As a result of technical evolutions, school curriculums have been changed and non-theatrical training methodologies have to be in place to cope up with the new syllabus. For example, a theoretical guide would of no use if adolescents want to learn computers. On top of this, the laboratory method of education could assist in improving not only cognitive development but also problem-solving abilities in students.
Another perk of the learning by doing is, the trainee gets a first-hand experience of practicing what has been taught. This plays a crucial role in retaining concepts and ideas. Therefore, graduates would never forget their studies as well as project works. Apart from this, observational learning has created a new sophisticated platform for tutee in career growth. Few developed nations like the Netherlands have already implemented exploratory learning and the results are phenomenal. It’s been playing an incredible role in improving school attendance and drop out are minimized.
To conclude, traditional pedagogy might be the best approach in the past. However, in modern age applied teaching, should be inducted so that graduates can prepare themselves better in this competitive world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little might'.
Suggestion: Little might
..., it opened the doors for a new debate. Few might argue that experimental training should...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10073583567 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2585828522 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123331820104 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383225955448 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538446368486 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822439718944 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543276446976 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.