Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experiential learning.
While others believe that traditional approach is still the best.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion?
Few people thought practical based coaching styles should be included in these days education system, on the other hand, people strongly argue that the classical strategy of educating students is even good. I strongly agree that an example based learning is an effective way of increasing our knowledge. This essay will firstly discuss the theoretical education system are incapable of providing vision to regarding topic, secondly, modern approach is easy to implement in technological development.
Learning with examples helps to extend concepts regarding the topic ineffective way. whereas getting an education without practical knowledge makes us dull even we are unfamiliar with its simple application. The well equipped and practically good environment can make the pupil to catch a lesson easily, also it maximizes the performance and interest towards learning. According to the research, the Chinese and Japanese have a maximum school and college attendees than other countries because of their simplified and the new styles of teaching and learning. In addition, the student ability to boost up with such an approach even the weaker students are familiar with the subject.
For next, the recent day's technologies based on the learning approach. Though the old theories are implacable to give us an idea but without making it clear doesn't give a track to start. All major developments are the contributions from the high school as well as college projects. For example, the law of floatation concept was developed many years ago, it's easy to read, but when the students get concepts regarding ships and boats new modifications on such products are even easy. Practical learning makes them technologically sound to endeavor their concepts.
In conclusion, the modern system with case-based learning increases understanding power of the students also motivate them for the development of new infrastructures based on their education. I believe a new education system with the exemplified approach is best than the traditional method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...hing styles should be included in these days education system, on the other hand, pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ts regarding the topic ineffective way. whereas getting an education without practical ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts regarding the topic ineffective way. whereas getting an education without practical ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... us an idea but without making it clear doesnt give a track to start. All major develo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49367088608 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95546579754 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2159955017 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151968090615 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515243879736 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478194454846 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100509811394 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508446290211 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.