The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the international visitor's ratio in Australia and Germany in 1960 and 2010.
Overall, the graph depicts the European tourist proportion was maximum in both countries, where Asian were the least traveller earlier. After a half-century, Australian tourism has a large number of Asian tourist and a few European, but Germany has a significant European to visit where the British were primarily low.
In 1960, the significant proportion of tourist in Australia and Germany were from Europe, they cover more than half tourist in Australia and 45% in Germany. The Asians are the least explorer, a tenth of tourists was Asian for both countries. Also, the travellers from Britain and the USA were more than 20% for Germany, wherein Australia people from states are just more than a tenth, and Britain covers the second-largest tourist source.
In 2010, There was a gradual increase in the Asian population in both nations, Asian covers 63% of the Australian tourism industry, they were the highest source where Germany has a quarter. Despite in Australia European reduces drastically by 42% and was the least source of tourist and 5% in Germany also had a dominance in the tourism industry. People from Britain reduces slightly and the USA in Australia but in Germany, it alters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
The charts compare the international visitors ratio in Australia and Germany in 1960 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a half-century, Australian tourism has a large number of Asian tourist and a few European, but G...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Australia and Germany were from Europe, they cover more than half tourist in Aus...
^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Australia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...than 20% for Germany, wherein Australia people from states are just more than a tenth,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13679245283 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71407650687 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8701697048 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0400244318405 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214138363415 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203282411927 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0328934930154 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193791565556 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.