The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the visitor's ratio from different part of the world in Australia and Germany in the year 1960 and 2010.
Overall, Asian seems travelling more than earlier, in Australia maximum people use to come from Europe where Asian were least but later it is reversed. In the case of Germany, European and Britain traveller get reduced and Asian and the USA got raised within the period.
According to the chart, in Australia in 1960 the majority of explorer were from Europe with 53 percentage and the Asian population was minor as compared to others. Whereas in 2010, Asian tourist was significant and 63% of tourist were from Asia which was just reversed in the case of Europe. In addition, The explorer from the USA was just above a tenth, and a quarter from Britain but during the period both countries reduce its ratio by 5.
Again for Germany, Europeans were the most to visit, it has 45% of the total also the Asian has a few proportions of 10% in 1960. In addition, the USA and British covers 25% and a fifth of traveller populations after 50-year British tourist reduce by more than a half and the USA's upsurged by 4%. In 2010, European were still the major visitor with 40% and Asian increase their number by 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
The charts compare the visitors ratio from different part of the world ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...an earlier, in Australia maximum people use to come from Europe where Asian were le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64090909091 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32511885416 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9904580879 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0586483479081 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275427853993 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229795084756 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421238380319 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136304684663 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.