The chart below gives information about Southland's main export in 2000, 2019, and future projection for 2025.
The chart compares the major sales of dairy products, meat products, and international tourism of Southland's in the year 2000, 2019, and predicts for the year 2025.
Overall, international tourism covers significant economy and raising in the future where meat products are declining its business on upcoming days and covers least economy. Also, the dairy products sales fluctuate with a massive raise than the past.
According to the chart, in 2000 international tourism covers a major business of almost 8 billion and it grows up by 1 billion for the next 2 years. It will be the greatest export in 2025 with maximum sales. The dairy products sales were 7 billion in 2000 but after 19 years it rapidly upsurge to nearly 10 billion, which is a significant sales presently. In addition, in 2025 dairy goods will reduce its business by half a billion but it will be nearly equal to tourism industries economy.
Again, the meat was the least economical product earlier and even in present and will be in the future. In 2000 products associated with meat generates 6 billions of revenue and this year it's deducted by a half. The meat products will raise the economy of 5 billion in 2025 which will be the least exports of years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'covers the least'.
Suggestion: covers the least
...ining its business on upcoming days and covers least economy. Also, the dairy products sales...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast. According to the chart, in 2000 international tourism covers a major bus...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mum sales. The dairy products sales were 7 billion in 2000 but after 19 years it ...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'upsurges'?
Suggestion: upsurges
...n in 2000 but after 19 years it rapidly upsurge to nearly 10 billion, which is a signif...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 billion'.
Suggestion: 6 billion
...products associated with meat generates 6 billions of revenue and this year its deducted by a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82547169811 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5877747127 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1531464744 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130631064511 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603173373434 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582333885142 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946937255304 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674722005134 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.