The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas Summarise the information

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.

Summarise the information

The bar chart compares the percentage of men who are native to Australia and from abroad, both the groups are youths and based on four different income categories in Sydney.

Overall, the population who are born in Australia have a maximum ratio of middle-level income but the least population has low income. Whereas, people from other nations have a minimum level for high income also the most significant proportion of people are in the lower-middle-income range.

According to the chart, firstly, the minority of people who are originated in Australia have a low-income level, it is just under 15%. About 5% more people have a high income, where more than half the population are in the order of lower-middle and mid-range of income. People withstanding lower-income group has 30% but the income group of $600 to $1000 has a majority with a ratio of a third.

Secondly, those who are non-native to Australia has a small ratio of people earning more than $1000, which was 5% less than Australian born. The middle-income ranges population is just above a fifth. In addition, people earning less than $300 and between $300 and $600 are more than other groups, the lower-middle group have approximately a third ratio, and it is highest among all.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople withstanding lower-income group has 30% but the income group of 00 to 000 ha...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92380952381 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92629024589 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7700555875 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155712155647 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813918868593 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702664564474 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124567588642 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738159000672 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.