The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

This bar graph illustrates the proportion of income groups of middle-aged people who are dwelling in Sydney and were born either in Australia or foreign countries.

There is more Australian-born citizens (35%) earning over $1000 than who were born overseas(nearly 27%). Similarly, this is the same for people who have a salary between $600-1000$. in which the percentage of the former people is the one-fifth compared to the latter with a mere 15%.

However, for the workforce who are in lower middle and low income groups the reverse is true. Regarding lower middle group who earn between $300 and $600, there is a stark difference in both type of people, around one-third. When it comes to lower income group, there is nearly a quarter of workers came from overseas in comparison with the opposite with under 15%.

Overall, it is clear that the figure for people who were born in Australia is as more as that of those who came from another countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ple who have a salary between 00-1000$. in which the percentage of the former peop...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e who were born in Australia is as more as that of those who came from another cou...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, third, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8282208589 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63783705907 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5850956134 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152475826369 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697198118798 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616220572925 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106932850579 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620199228052 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.