In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
More and more countries are developing their transport industries for facilitating travelling within in cities. Some argue that more funding need to build new high-speed railway systems between cities, while the others claim that government should spend more money on public transportation. This essay will look into both sides and give a conclusion.
Advancements of traveling among cities is one of the key factors of market development. Exchange goods between cities has positive implications to local factories, who produce dairy, meat or vegetarian products, to convey in a short time which means people would have more fresh meals. Another benefit might be new openings for people who involved in serving of tourists. As travel duration, internal tourism would be rapidly boosted and there would be expected a revenue increment. For example, a group of tourists coming to a country for two or three days may visit more attractive and breathtaking places and purchase a number of antique items from local stores than used to be.
However, travelling between cities is not popular among local people. It is argued that they sometimes suffer from lateness of public transports to get to work or schools due to insufficient road lines. Occasionally, buses and trolleybuses have higher preferences than private cars, but quantity and quality might not be satisfying. Therefore, citizens believe that current public transports are far more urgent rather than new railway lines.
In conclusion, new railway system would flourish tourism in a country and create new posts in this domain. Nevertheless, some individuals prefer that government should improve existing public transportation system for tackling vehicle challenges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ars, but quantity and quality might not be satisfying. Therefore, citizens believe that curre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53007518797 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8603884415 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2889115587 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277070136608 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843503322905 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065326964903 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16539181597 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510223556697 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.