The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The charts illustrate the number of graduate and post-graduate students did after completing their course in a college excluding full-time work in the UK in the year 2008.
Overall, both the graduate and post-graduate scholar had a maximum number of students attending further study, and the least number of students were engaged in voluntary work. Also, the count of graduates was too large than post-graduates.
According to the first bar chart, approximately 30,000 graduate students were planning for further study in 2008. Where the number of part-time workers and unemployed were likely to be same, they were just above 15,000. A tiny number of people (3500) were active in voluntary works.
Again, from the second chart, like graduates, a significant number of post-graduates scholars were doing further study, which is nearly ten times lesser than graduate. But, the part-time worker accounted for 2535 people, that was the second choice for the students. In addition, 1625 of them were unemployed that year, the count for a volunteer was below 500
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he first bar chart, approximately 30,000 graduate students were planning for furt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29585798817 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78569424628 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3136437151 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30311382231 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131754547628 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153341160081 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233385931478 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176613222439 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.