The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The two bar graphs illustrate what graduate and postgraduate pupils in the United Kingdom did in 2008, when they chose not to go into regular full-time jobs after finishing college.
Overall, both graduates and postgraduates preferred further education over everything else. In contrast, the second most popular option was doing a part-time job, while unemployment and voluntary work seemed to take the last place in the chart.
First of all, 29,665 undergraduates, who did not plan on taking up a full-time job, went on to pursue higher studies. However, 17,735 chose to do part-time work, while 3,500 volunteered their skills. Also a big portion remained unemployed.
Lastly, the most number of postgraduates (2,725) also perused further studies. Similar to graduates, second most chosen option was a part-time job, while volunteering was the least chosen task. Furthermore, 1,625 postgraduates stayed unemployed in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., while 3,500 volunteered their skills. Also a big portion remained unemployed. La...
^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to task'
Suggestion: to task
...while volunteering was the least chosen task. Furthermore, 1,625 postgraduates staye...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, lastly, second, so, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53521126761 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96385184755 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.697183098592 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.372539442 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204199583513 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761839797951 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707087717203 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130013277816 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731960869733 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.